Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24421 - 24430 of 41688 for jury duty/1000.

State v. Eugene Thomas
for a new trial. We affirm the judgment and the order. ¶2 Thomas was convicted after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16169 - 2005-03-31

Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
for longer than one year.[3] The allegations of the petitions were tried to a jury. At the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13213 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Turner
and clothing. ¶5 The jury found Turner guilty of all counts charged. Turner was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15749 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason R. Sigmon
We note that the current pattern jury instruction for the offense Sigmon pled to includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21071 - 2006-01-25

[PDF] WI APP 195
with a prohibited alcohol concentration—fifth offense. His one day jury trial was held on December 12, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29514 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Tara P.
and certain actions taken by the County prior to the dispositional orders. ¶5 The jury found in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4587 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 30
., joined. ¶1 REBECCA FRANK DALLET, J. A jury found Carl Lee McAdory guilty of both operating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977954 - 2025-07-01

[PDF] 2023AP645-CR
., joined. ¶1 REBECCA FRANK DALLET, J. A jury found Carl Lee McAdory guilty of both operating a motor
/supreme/docs/23ap645mandate.pdf - 2025-07-01

[PDF] JN-1540; Request to Modify, Extend Limited/Temporary, Reconsider/Modify Emergency, or Terminate Guardianship (48.9795, Wis. Stats.)
, and able to carry out the duties of a guardian or that no compelling facts or circumstances exist
/formdisplay/JN-1540.pdf?formNumber=JN-1540&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-09

State v. Chris M. Holland
no duty to state why it believed some of Holland’s testimony but not all of it. ¶4 Moreover, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17948 - 2005-05-03