Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24431 - 24440 of 57165 for id.
Search results 24431 - 24440 of 57165 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
accurate information. Id. A defendant who requests resentencing must show that specific information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
accurate information. Id. A defendant who requests resentencing must show that specific information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
State v. Roosevelt Bennett, Jr.
examination can be ordered. Id. ¶7 Immediately after trial, the trial court made the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4080 - 2005-03-31
examination can be ordered. Id. ¶7 Immediately after trial, the trial court made the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
outlined in our prior decision resolving Murray’s direct appeal. See id., No. 2016AP481-CR, ¶¶3-9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247599 - 2019-10-01
outlined in our prior decision resolving Murray’s direct appeal. See id., No. 2016AP481-CR, ¶¶3-9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247599 - 2019-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes grounds for finding a position lacking in substantial justification.” Id. “In evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137250 - 2015-03-11
constitutes grounds for finding a position lacking in substantial justification.” Id. “In evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137250 - 2015-03-11
[PDF]
John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
by a reasonable number of hours.” Id. Our review is limited to whether the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2873 - 2017-09-19
by a reasonable number of hours.” Id. Our review is limited to whether the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2873 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶4 (emphasis added). However, here, the circuit court was not considering a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
.” Id., ¶4 (emphasis added). However, here, the circuit court was not considering a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
over the defendant in the first instance, and service that is merely technically defective.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124880 - 2017-09-21
over the defendant in the first instance, and service that is merely technically defective.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Golden Valley Supply Company v. The American Insurance Co.
. App. 1992). That methodology has been set forth numerous times, and we need not repeat it here. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8609 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1992). That methodology has been set forth numerous times, and we need not repeat it here. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8609 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exempted by statute. The specific exemptions are found in § 767.[61](2)(a).” 4 Id., ¶45 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170448 - 2017-09-21
exempted by statute. The specific exemptions are found in § 767.[61](2)(a).” 4 Id., ¶45 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170448 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas L. Stafford
to evidence which delivers exculpatory evidence into the hands of the accused. Id. The State’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4995 - 2005-03-31
to evidence which delivers exculpatory evidence into the hands of the accused. Id. The State’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4995 - 2005-03-31

