Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24441 - 24450 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Megal Laundromat, Inc. v. Suds-R-Us, Inc.
at trial.” We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Megal and Suds entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
representation when he failed to challenge the plea colloquy and his trial lawyer’s performance with regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21

Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
of a receiver to aid in the collection of the judgment. ¶2 We conclude that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Donald J. Draves
" evidence and (2) the prosecutor's closing arguments denied him a fair trial. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Gregory A. Miller
) the trial court erred in denying his request for a theory of defense instruction. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11991 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
failed to establish a sufficient factual basis for his plea and that his trial counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09

State v. Gregory A. Miller
to support the jury’s verdict on the first-degree reckless injury charge; and (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Bor-Mor, Inc.
was too narrowly focused, preventing the jury from considering all the evidence, and that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6686 - 2005-03-31

M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
, the defamation claim should be dismissed. The trial court concluded that the absolute privilege asserted by WFA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4916 - 2005-03-31

State v. Casey J. Schneck
. Schneck challenges the trial court’s ruling that the summary judgment procedure set out in Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31