Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24451 - 24460 of 29996 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, because I review de novo the issue of whether the wardens’ entry into the cabin violated the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691727 - 2023-08-17

State v. Larry D. Harris
situations where, in the context of the case, the deprivations were essentially de minimis. For example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
An appellate court reviewing summary judgment applies de novo review, following the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82285 - 2014-09-15

Cassandra Sherrill Patterson v. Lynns Waste Paper Co.
treatment of this woman in light of Dr. Dahl’s opinion as to the de minimus nature of her injuries and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10134 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is itself a question of law” that we review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189731 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Titus Graham
to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24635 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Clarence Givens
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12420 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Timothy Conant v. Physicians Plus Medical Group, Inc.
Timothy’s injuries. We review this legal question de novo, benefiting however from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14787 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Justice C. Granger
violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo. See State v. Ross, 203 Wis.2d 66, 79, 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13476 - 2017-09-21