Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24451 - 24460 of 51767 for him.
Search results 24451 - 24460 of 51767 for him.
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
, Jr., appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
, Jr., appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
and drinking at the same time on the same day and at the same place,” charging him twice for bail jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10226 - 2017-09-20
and drinking at the same time on the same day and at the same place,” charging him twice for bail jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10226 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
about the proration, she commenced this action against him and obtained the above-referenced judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13
about the proration, she commenced this action against him and obtained the above-referenced judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13
State v. Tomas Rodrequez Consuegra
rights would have caused him to plead differently. Consuegra’s motion does not do so, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
rights would have caused him to plead differently. Consuegra’s motion does not do so, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted defendant permits him or her a single appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28013 - 2014-09-15
is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted defendant permits him or her a single appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28013 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel Slaughter
lacked jurisdiction to convict him because the statute of limitations had run on the charge. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
lacked jurisdiction to convict him because the statute of limitations had run on the charge. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the Nos. 2009AP1872 2009AP1873 6 Department prevented him from establishing visits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43027 - 2014-09-15
by the Nos. 2009AP1872 2009AP1873 6 Department prevented him from establishing visits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43027 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the first case, and in 2007, the court sentenced him to a concurrent sentence of twenty-five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638090 - 2023-03-29
on the first case, and in 2007, the court sentenced him to a concurrent sentence of twenty-five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638090 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him of possession with the intent to deliver narcotics. Hady argues the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
him of possession with the intent to deliver narcotics. Hady argues the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian M. Byrnes
holding him liable for a child support arrearage and future child support at the rate of 17% of his gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5799 - 2005-03-31
holding him liable for a child support arrearage and future child support at the rate of 17% of his gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5799 - 2005-03-31

