Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24451 - 24460 of 84101 for simple case search.
Search results 24451 - 24460 of 84101 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 20-08 - Comments from Kathleen A. Brost, President, State Bar of Wisconsin
related to retention of records based on outcome of a case rather than charges. In its letter
/supreme/docs/2008commentsbrost.pdf - 2021-03-02
related to retention of records based on outcome of a case rather than charges. In its letter
/supreme/docs/2008commentsbrost.pdf - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - May 2011
to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62029 - 2014-09-15
to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62029 - 2014-09-15
06-01 Amendment of SCR 72.01 Regarding Record Retention (Effective 7-1-06)
Rules is amended to read: 72.01 (8) Small claims case files. All papers deposited with the clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25021 - 2006-04-30
Rules is amended to read: 72.01 (8) Small claims case files. All papers deposited with the clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25021 - 2006-04-30
[PDF]
Court of Appeals procedures for expedited appeals
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
State v. William McCall
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
case is a question of law we review independently of the trial court. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
case is a question of law we review independently of the trial court. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21