Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24461 - 24470 of 65156 for or b.

COURT OF APPEALS
with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39994 - 2009-08-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for newly discovered evidence. See WIS. STAT. §§ 805.15(3); 806.07(1)(b). To the extent that Vermeul
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016859 - 2025-10-02

[PDF] State v. William P. Bigboy
will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS. 2017-09-20T08:33:16-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10230 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32(1)(b). Similarly, counsel stated that he had been unable to serve a copy of the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=931572 - 2025-03-25

COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84850 - 2012-11-13

Gary C. Salveson v. Mary G. Hanson
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9993 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas Brieske
was not clearly erroneous. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14035 - 2005-03-31

State v. David W. Pender
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31

Clorox/Moores's Food Products * v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. By the Court.—Order reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9128 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60654 - 2014-09-15