Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24461 - 24470 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24461 - 24470 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Draves
" evidence and (2) the prosecutor's closing arguments denied him a fair trial. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
" evidence and (2) the prosecutor's closing arguments denied him a fair trial. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
, we affirm. Following a jury trial, Sersted was convicted of first-degree reckless injury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
, we affirm. Following a jury trial, Sersted was convicted of first-degree reckless injury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
David L. Nichols v. Charles D. Wingrove
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] The trial court found attorney David Nichols in contempt for failure to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3357 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] The trial court found attorney David Nichols in contempt for failure to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3357 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
representation when he failed to challenge the plea colloquy and his trial lawyer’s performance with regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
representation when he failed to challenge the plea colloquy and his trial lawyer’s performance with regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
of a receiver to aid in the collection of the judgment. ¶2 We conclude that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
of a receiver to aid in the collection of the judgment. ¶2 We conclude that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
Megal Laundromat, Inc. v. Suds-R-Us, Inc.
at trial.” We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Megal and Suds entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2015-03-31
at trial.” We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Megal and Suds entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to adjourn to enable him to obtain a valid driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30324 - 2007-09-17
to adjourn to enable him to obtain a valid driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30324 - 2007-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Bowens argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Bowens argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard Dodson
to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding the evidence under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17113 - 2017-09-21
to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding the evidence under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17113 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard Dodson
Dodson’s right to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2005-03-31
Dodson’s right to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2005-03-31