Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24471 - 24480 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24471 - 24480 of 30247 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72904 - 2011-10-26
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72904 - 2011-10-26
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review this question de novo and “consider the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868500 - 2024-10-29
. We review this question de novo and “consider the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868500 - 2024-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
his child would very likely experience by visiting him in prison.” Schroeder requested de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68993 - 2011-08-08
his child would very likely experience by visiting him in prison.” Schroeder requested de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68993 - 2011-08-08
John W. Kneubuhler II v. Labor & industry Review Commission
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 2
process and the other on equal protection.[3] Both challenges present questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27522 - 2007-01-30
process and the other on equal protection.[3] Both challenges present questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27522 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the gravity with which this court views judicial misconduct." Id., ¶39. We impose discipline on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21
the gravity with which this court views judicial misconduct." Id., ¶39. We impose discipline on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Shannon L. Labine
by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8103 - 2017-09-19
by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darcy Stafford
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11541 - 2017-09-19
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11541 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo, using the same methodology as does the circuit court. See Heaton v. Mountin, 2000 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597477 - 2022-12-06
de novo, using the same methodology as does the circuit court. See Heaton v. Mountin, 2000 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597477 - 2022-12-06