Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24471 - 24480 of 81903 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

Phillip Adam v. Brown County
. Phillip Adam, a nurse, testified that in order to receive reports on the condition of clients from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Phillip Adam v. Brown County
harassed and filed a grievance. Phillip Adam, a nurse, testified that in order to receive reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or threat to an officer, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, resisting an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11

State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer
enterprise as one involving a violation of the drug statutes where the violation is a part of a continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Pursuant to an order of this court, the trial court conducted a hearing at which Stokes testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59520 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.” Pursuant to an order of this court, the trial court conducted a hearing at which Stokes testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59520 - 2011-02-24

James Bruno v. Milwaukee County
and the court of appeals concluded that in order to have "retired from the county" for purposes of the military
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16531 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James Bruno v. Milwaukee County
that in order to have "retired from the county" for purposes of the military service credit, a retirement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16531 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4042 - 2017-09-20

State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
-element test that a defendant must “prove” in order to be entitled to the defense.[5] ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31