Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24481 - 24490 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 24481 - 24490 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Paul J. May v. Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission
. The trial court dismissed with prejudice, because the appellants admittedly failed to comply with § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9188 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court dismissed with prejudice, because the appellants admittedly failed to comply with § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9188 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9867 - 2005-03-31
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9867 - 2005-03-31
Claudia C. Kalous v. Richard Kalous
-sufficient. The trial court had the power to alter stipulated maintenance for changed circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12685 - 2005-03-31
-sufficient. The trial court had the power to alter stipulated maintenance for changed circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12685 - 2005-03-31
Claudia I. v. John F.M.
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Claudia I. appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing a paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14078 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Claudia I. appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing a paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14078 - 2005-03-31
Robert F. Nagel v. State
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9867 - 2017-09-19
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9867 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to clarify precedent related to erroneous jury instructions in criminal trials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144313 - 2017-09-21
to clarify precedent related to erroneous jury instructions in criminal trials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144313 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard Dodson
Dodson’s right to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2005-03-31
Dodson’s right to a fair trial and that the State of Wisconsin’s (State’s) interest in excluding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
this court to clarify precedent related to erroneous jury instructions in criminal trials. ¶2 Maltese
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144313 - 2015-07-09
this court to clarify precedent related to erroneous jury instructions in criminal trials. ¶2 Maltese
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144313 - 2015-07-09