Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24481 - 24490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24481 - 24490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
Griffin appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13555 - 2005-03-31
Griffin appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert F. Nagel v. State
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7833 - 2017-09-19
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7833 - 2017-09-19
State v. Raymond T. Golden
. The no merit report first addresses the question of effective assistance of trial counsel. While no Machner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
. The no merit report first addresses the question of effective assistance of trial counsel. While no Machner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
Paul J. May v. Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission
. The trial court dismissed with prejudice, because the appellants admittedly failed to comply with § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9188 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court dismissed with prejudice, because the appellants admittedly failed to comply with § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9188 - 2005-03-31
Claudia I. v. John F.M.
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Claudia I. appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing a paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14078 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Claudia I. appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing a paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
Robert F. Nagel v. State
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9867 - 2005-03-31
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9867 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Jerome Thornton
for judgment). The trial court held a hearing on January 12, 2004. Thornton appeared pro se, and claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7355 - 2017-09-20
for judgment). The trial court held a hearing on January 12, 2004. Thornton appeared pro se, and claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7355 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9867 - 2017-09-19
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9867 - 2017-09-19