Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24491 - 24500 of 51575 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
Search results 24491 - 24500 of 51575 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
COURT OF APPEALS
costs and violated Wisconsin’s consumer protection laws. In his response brief, Luedeke states that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
costs and violated Wisconsin’s consumer protection laws. In his response brief, Luedeke states that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissions, $944.00 in training expenses, as well as costs. ¶6 Brakefield appears to be challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88637 - 2014-09-15
commissions, $944.00 in training expenses, as well as costs. ¶6 Brakefield appears to be challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88637 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel L Taylor
a jury trial. Subsequently, the court convicted Taylor of OAR, fined him $2000 plus costs, and sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11231 - 2005-03-31
a jury trial. Subsequently, the court convicted Taylor of OAR, fined him $2000 plus costs, and sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
privileges, the minimum $300 fine and costs, and a ten percent restitution surcharge. 3 The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138012 - 2017-09-21
privileges, the minimum $300 fine and costs, and a ten percent restitution surcharge. 3 The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138012 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles A. Toal
, and the court imposed an $800.00 fine plus costs and a 20-day jail sentence. This appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
, and the court imposed an $800.00 fine plus costs and a 20-day jail sentence. This appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in part and reversed in part. Costs to Donald Jackelen. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62771 - 2014-09-15
in part and reversed in part. Costs to Donald Jackelen. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62771 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for the purpose of obtaining an updated valuation because of the likelihood of increased costs and a lengthy delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72523 - 2011-10-19
for the purpose of obtaining an updated valuation because of the likelihood of increased costs and a lengthy delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72523 - 2011-10-19
Hector Cubero v. Record Custodian
Cubero is entitled to damages and actual costs under § 19.37(2)(a), Stats., for prevailing in a mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7872 - 2005-03-31
Cubero is entitled to damages and actual costs under § 19.37(2)(a), Stats., for prevailing in a mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Norman Kuehling v. Village of Unity
The Village moves for attorney’s fees and costs, arguing that this appeal is frivolous. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5630 - 2017-09-19
The Village moves for attorney’s fees and costs, arguing that this appeal is frivolous. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5630 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and the parties jointly recommended a $100 fine plus costs. After a contested restitution hearing, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02
; and the parties jointly recommended a $100 fine plus costs. After a contested restitution hearing, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02