Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
, we review questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15035 - 2005-03-31
, we review questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15035 - 2005-03-31
Beverly Drews v. Carol Marwede
, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25891 - 2006-07-17
, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25891 - 2006-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Clifton M. Wright
that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d at 561. We agree with the State that claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10817 - 2017-09-20
that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d at 561. We agree with the State that claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10817 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smothers
constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12965 - 2017-09-21
constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12965 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
, the order is affirmed. DISCUSSION Scope of Review. This court will determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
, the order is affirmed. DISCUSSION Scope of Review. This court will determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brian Scott Nooyen v. Bonita June Nooyen
Nooyen moved for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18097 - 2017-09-21
Nooyen moved for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
the marijuana. II. This case presents two interrelated questions, both of which are subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
the marijuana. II. This case presents two interrelated questions, both of which are subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31