Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 29821 for des.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the issue of whether a sentence violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115008 - 2017-09-21
, the issue of whether a sentence violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
, 306, 550 N.W.2d 103, 110 (1996). No. 98-1448 5 court’s statutory construction is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
, 306, 550 N.W.2d 103, 110 (1996). No. 98-1448 5 court’s statutory construction is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
subject to our de novo review, as is the meaning of plain contract language. Lynch v. Crossroads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
subject to our de novo review, as is the meaning of plain contract language. Lynch v. Crossroads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Landreman v. Martin, 191 Wis. 2d 787, 794, 530 N.W.2d 62 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213566 - 2018-05-30
of law, which we review de novo. Landreman v. Martin, 191 Wis. 2d 787, 794, 530 N.W.2d 62 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213566 - 2018-05-30
The Estate of Ann M. Ernst v. Dennis John Ernst
as a party to this action. [2] The Estates suggest that this court conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31
as a party to this action. [2] The Estates suggest that this court conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn H.
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12717 - 2005-03-31
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12717 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 16
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2010-01-26
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2010-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26