Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 12891 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
) (“suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
was void, as were all subsequent proceedings in his prosecution. The circuit court rejected Bellinger’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
was void, as were all subsequent proceedings in his prosecution. The circuit court rejected Bellinger’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
should have allowed him to introduce evidence of the gang affiliation of prosecution witnesses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29999 - 2007-08-15
should have allowed him to introduce evidence of the gang affiliation of prosecution witnesses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29999 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy A. Heisz
of the number of witnesses for both prosecution and defense, a seven-page presentence report was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
of the number of witnesses for both prosecution and defense, a seven-page presentence report was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
erroneously concluded that Kent’s post-sentencing cooperation in a homicide prosecution was not a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27575 - 2006-12-26
erroneously concluded that Kent’s post-sentencing cooperation in a homicide prosecution was not a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27575 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Sisakhone S. Douangmala
oppressive delay between the commission of an offense and the initiation of the prosecution. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4280 - 2017-09-19
oppressive delay between the commission of an offense and the initiation of the prosecution. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him[.]” Article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30452 - 2014-09-15
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him[.]” Article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30452 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) whether any other non-harmless errors “marred … Rodriguez’s prosecution.” (Some capitalization omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575150 - 2022-10-04
) whether any other non-harmless errors “marred … Rodriguez’s prosecution.” (Some capitalization omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575150 - 2022-10-04
State v. Alexander Dejesus
decline an officer's request without fearing prosecution. Id. Since Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
decline an officer's request without fearing prosecution. Id. Since Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eddie L. Johnikin
counsel because counsel mistakenly advised him that the State was prevented from prosecuting him again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18695 - 2017-09-21
counsel because counsel mistakenly advised him that the State was prevented from prosecuting him again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18695 - 2017-09-21