Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
] The trial court terminated the parental rights of H.H., Jr., and L.H. to their nonmarital children, H.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147004 - 2015-08-25
] The trial court terminated the parental rights of H.H., Jr., and L.H. to their nonmarital children, H.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147004 - 2015-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
that trial counsel was ineffective and for not properly impeaching trial counsel at a Machner[2] hearing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36565 - 2009-05-26
that trial counsel was ineffective and for not properly impeaching trial counsel at a Machner[2] hearing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36565 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Before Reilly, J. 1 The trial court terminated the parental rights of H.H., Jr., and L.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147004 - 2017-09-21
Before Reilly, J. 1 The trial court terminated the parental rights of H.H., Jr., and L.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
who represented him on his direct appeal was ineffective for failing to raise claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36565 - 2014-09-15
who represented him on his direct appeal was ineffective for failing to raise claims that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36565 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46256 - 2014-09-15
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46256 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46256 - 2010-01-25
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46256 - 2010-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Department of Human Services. She asks this court to vacate the order and remand for a new trial. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04
Department of Human Services. She asks this court to vacate the order and remand for a new trial. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04
[PDF]
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when on the morning of trial, it granted Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19
. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when on the morning of trial, it granted Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. On appeal, he argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85521 - 2012-07-30
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. On appeal, he argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85521 - 2012-07-30
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
to Paul Sr.’s grandson, Paul R. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
to Paul Sr.’s grandson, Paul R. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31