Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 58458 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46256 - 2010-01-25

[PDF] NOTICE
to a new trial because the trial court: (1) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence from the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46256 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Department of Human Services. She asks this court to vacate the order and remand for a new trial. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04

COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. On appeal, he argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85521 - 2012-07-30

Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
to Paul Sr.’s grandson, Paul R. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31

Gwendolyn K. Jeffro v. Hormel Foods Corporation
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Gwendolyn K. Jeffro appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13249 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
. Sharpley III. Paul Jr. contends that the trial court erred when on the morning of trial, it granted Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19

State v. Gregory D. Jens
: (1) the trial court erroneously denied Jens’s request to represent himself at trial; (2) Jens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7073 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gwendolyn K. Jeffro v. Hormel Foods Corporation
. PER CURIAM. Gwendolyn K. Jeffro appeals from the trial court judgment granting Hormel Foods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13249 - 2017-09-21

State v. Loren L. Leiser
for a new trial, and from an order summarily denying his consequent motion for reconsideration. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25141 - 2006-05-15