Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 91533 for 1.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 91533 for 1.
[PDF]
Friedrich Bohn v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
an order remanding this case to the Commission for a hearing.1 The issue is whether the Commission must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13965 - 2014-09-15
an order remanding this case to the Commission for a hearing.1 The issue is whether the Commission must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13965 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Doucette first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96255 - 2005-03-31
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Doucette first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96255 - 2005-03-31
Betty L. Conway v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the Town of Harmony
court granted the motion, and then denied reconsideration, resulting in this appeal. Section 59.99,[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10797 - 2005-03-31
court granted the motion, and then denied reconsideration, resulting in this appeal. Section 59.99,[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott Elvers
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Scott Elvers appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4122 - 2017-09-20
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Scott Elvers appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4122 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Gundrum, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777863 - 2024-03-20
) Before Gundrum, P.J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777863 - 2024-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-20)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pfaff was advised of his right to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
-20)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pfaff was advised of his right to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: MEL FLANAGAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28474 - 2014-09-15
County: MEL FLANAGAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28474 - 2014-09-15
Susan C. Lulling-Porter v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
is whether habeas corpus is available to her. We conclude that it is not, and therefore affirm.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9156 - 2010-03-02
is whether habeas corpus is available to her. We conclude that it is not, and therefore affirm.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9156 - 2010-03-02
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm. The circuit court dismissed Coburn’s petition due to defective service
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144465 - 2015-07-12
809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm. The circuit court dismissed Coburn’s petition due to defective service
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144465 - 2015-07-12