Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 63388 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 63388 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. John J. Delacruz
motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7276 - 2005-03-31
motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
court's order and judgment,2 which denied the School District's motion for attorney fees. The School
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254062 - 2020-04-07
court's order and judgment,2 which denied the School District's motion for attorney fees. The School
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254062 - 2020-04-07
Frontsheet
disclosure deadline had passed, Attorney Winkel filed a motion to extend the deadline, along with a late
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144075 - 2015-07-06
disclosure deadline had passed, Attorney Winkel filed a motion to extend the deadline, along with a late
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144075 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
from a jury verdict and an order denying their postverdict motions. The Oppors filed this negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
from a jury verdict and an order denying their postverdict motions. The Oppors filed this negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
charges. Carter also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262287 - 2020-06-02
charges. Carter also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262287 - 2020-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
denying their postverdict motions. The Oppors filed this negligence action against Howard M. Siegle, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
denying their postverdict motions. The Oppors filed this negligence action against Howard M. Siegle, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
State v. Robert Carnemolla
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) he was deprived of due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) he was deprived of due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2012
in response to District IV Court of Appeals’ order denying the SPD’s and the state’s motions
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88944 - 2014-09-15
in response to District IV Court of Appeals’ order denying the SPD’s and the state’s motions
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88944 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edward G. Harris
on a "Motion to Adjudicate" filed by the OLR in response to Harris's discovery violations. Ultimately, Harris
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16595 - 2005-03-31
on a "Motion to Adjudicate" filed by the OLR in response to Harris's discovery violations. Ultimately, Harris
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Carnemolla
him of substantial battery and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
him of substantial battery and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21