Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 29828 for des.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. Defense counsel adequately advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164600 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. Defense counsel adequately advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164600 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107453 - 2017-09-21
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, whether these findings satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452956 - 2021-11-12
, whether these findings satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452956 - 2021-11-12
[PDF]
Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required test is that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14169 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required test is that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 41
. No. 2006AP870-CR 4 Standard of Review ¶4 We review statutory construction de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28014 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2006AP870-CR 4 Standard of Review ¶4 We review statutory construction de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kristin Galatowitsch v. James Wanat
. No. 00-0199 6 contract language presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2179 - 2017-09-19
. No. 00-0199 6 contract language presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2179 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Victor Naydihor
review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24 Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24 Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Diane L. Finster v. James R. Finster
, whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5892 - 2017-09-19
, whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5892 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Tammy Turner v. Gene Dencker Buick-Pontiac, Inc.
of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis. 2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16274 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis. 2d 158, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16274 - 2017-09-21