Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24501 - 24510 of 29823 for des.
State v. Avery L. Dallapiazza
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently is a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4615 - 2005-03-31
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently is a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4615 - 2005-03-31
State v. Romell Lampley
sentence on numerous grounds. He also requested a de novo sentencing hearing for the purpose of presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31
sentence on numerous grounds. He also requested a de novo sentencing hearing for the purpose of presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas P. Sterzinger
in this appeal is one of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we decide de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4018 - 2017-09-20
in this appeal is one of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we decide de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4018 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 152
to the findings of fact de novo. Further, we are not constrained to the [trial] court’s reasoning in affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15
to the findings of fact de novo. Further, we are not constrained to the [trial] court’s reasoning in affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
"), or at least tacitly No. 96-1988 7 conceded the de minimis nature of counsel's comment. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11095 - 2017-09-19
"), or at least tacitly No. 96-1988 7 conceded the de minimis nature of counsel's comment. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11095 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John Foster Fant
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“prevent[ed] or ma[de] more difficult the performance of the officer’s duties”; (2) the officer was doing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289341 - 2020-09-22
“prevent[ed] or ma[de] more difficult the performance of the officer’s duties”; (2) the officer was doing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289341 - 2020-09-22
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ted Ricci
or should have been known warrants a finding of frivolousness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4300 - 2005-03-31
or should have been known warrants a finding of frivolousness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a particular party is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Herrmann, 2015 WI App 97, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
to a particular party is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Herrmann, 2015 WI App 97, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
Sandra Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc.
. Stat. § 802.08(2) (1995- 96). We interpret an insurance policy's terms under a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17069 - 2017-09-21
. Stat. § 802.08(2) (1995- 96). We interpret an insurance policy's terms under a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17069 - 2017-09-21