Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24511 - 24520 of 29712 for des.
Search results 24511 - 24520 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For veterans
-4849. Outagamie County Outagamie County Circuit Court Judges John A. Des Jardins and Gregory B. Gill Jr
/services/veteran/index.htm - 2026-01-01
-4849. Outagamie County Outagamie County Circuit Court Judges John A. Des Jardins and Gregory B. Gill Jr
/services/veteran/index.htm - 2026-01-01
COURT OF APPEALS
. That is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
. That is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
will review this claim de novo. See Szymczak v. Terrace at St. Francis, 2006 WI App 3, ¶¶10-11, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35207 - 2005-03-31
will review this claim de novo. See Szymczak v. Terrace at St. Francis, 2006 WI App 3, ¶¶10-11, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35207 - 2005-03-31
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2009-03-23
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2005-03-31
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59952 - 2008-07-09
de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59952 - 2008-07-09
State v. Robert Carnemolla
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wallace I. Stenzel
of initial confinement is a de facto life sentence. Stenzel asserts: Age of the defendant is critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7023 - 2005-03-31
of initial confinement is a de facto life sentence. Stenzel asserts: Age of the defendant is critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7023 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2005-03-31
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2005-03-31