Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24511 - 24520 of 57351 for id.
Search results 24511 - 24520 of 57351 for id.
State v. Benjamin L. Simms
that the court had determined voluntariness. We conclude otherwise. McKinley involved three issues. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14953 - 2005-03-31
that the court had determined voluntariness. We conclude otherwise. McKinley involved three issues. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14953 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the proceedings. Id., ¶31. A trial court’s competency determination should be reversed only when clearly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2013-09-23
of the proceedings. Id., ¶31. A trial court’s competency determination should be reversed only when clearly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court reviews such questions de novo. Id. “Whether the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
. This court reviews such questions de novo. Id. “Whether the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a file containing medical records. Id. at 392. Uebelacker fails to acknowledge the Hillman decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20
a file containing medical records. Id. at 392. Uebelacker fails to acknowledge the Hillman decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20
State v. Crystal C. Parker
acted reasonably. Id. The defendant must demonstrate an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2005-03-31
acted reasonably. Id. The defendant must demonstrate an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea. Id. See also State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (the manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
the plea. Id. See also State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (the manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50002 - 2010-05-17
by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50002 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to inform defendants about the mandatory DNA surcharge.” See id., ¶12. Consequently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223762 - 2018-10-18
to inform defendants about the mandatory DNA surcharge.” See id., ¶12. Consequently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223762 - 2018-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their experiences, philosophies, and common sense to bear in their deliberations.” See id. at 264. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
their experiences, philosophies, and common sense to bear in their deliberations.” See id. at 264. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2009AP2496-CR, ¶1. We affirmed the judgment, see id., and the Wisconsin Supreme Court denied Carpenter’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231409 - 2018-12-21
, No. 2009AP2496-CR, ¶1. We affirmed the judgment, see id., and the Wisconsin Supreme Court denied Carpenter’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231409 - 2018-12-21