Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24511 - 24520 of 57351 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
, as a whole, misled the jury or communicated an incorrect statement of law.” Id. Further, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93144 - 2013-02-25

State of Wisconsin v. Gale D. Nelson
of law which we review de novo.” Id.; see also State v. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d 49, 78, 485 N.W.2d 237 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25964 - 2006-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
are afforded the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably.’” Id. (citation omitted). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27378 - 2006-12-11

[PDF] State v. Roosevelt Bennett, Jr.
be ordered. Id. ¶7 Immediately after trial, the trial court made the determination to place Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4080 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Cornelius R. Reed
not address both components of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4561 - 2017-09-20

State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
his plea.[5] See id. at 55. The defendant satisfied his initial burden by establishing a facial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
accurate information. Id. A defendant who requests resentencing must show that specific information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18

John A. Seitz v. Waukesha County
id. The Commission’s decision is entitled to a presumption of validity, see id. at 8, 515 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9550 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
building with a net worth of $622,065. Id., ¶72. In actuality we concluded the marital assets were worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30825 - 2007-11-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and intelligently. Id. at 274. ¶6 We do not regard this as a Bangert case. Sulla does not argue that a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142087 - 2017-09-21