Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24521 - 24530 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24521 - 24530 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process is a question of law that we review de novo.8 See Monroe Cty. DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06
process is a question of law that we review de novo.8 See Monroe Cty. DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
Paul Closser v. Town of Harding
statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. Barth v. Board of Educ., 108 Wis.2d 511, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11619 - 2017-09-19
statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. Barth v. Board of Educ., 108 Wis.2d 511, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11619 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336154 - 2021-02-17
to order restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336154 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
Duane Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
in promulgating a rule, we use a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶25. As we do in construing all statutes, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
in promulgating a rule, we use a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶25. As we do in construing all statutes, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dale Steinbach
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 202
. Our review of Judge Murray’s interpretation and application of § 968.26 is de novo. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29722 - 2014-09-15
. Our review of Judge Murray’s interpretation and application of § 968.26 is de novo. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 143
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous and we decide de novo the legal question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous and we decide de novo the legal question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
Douglas M. Weed v. Steven P. Anderson
judgment. An appeal of a summary judgment ruling raises an issue of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11412 - 2005-03-31
judgment. An appeal of a summary judgment ruling raises an issue of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11412 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Evans’s testimony and only required that the jurors use their common sense, not medical knowledge. See De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
Evans’s testimony and only required that the jurors use their common sense, not medical knowledge. See De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the movant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14
the movant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14