Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24531 - 24540 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
. Koeppen’s claims are based on a construction of the conditions of the bond that is unreasonable and absurd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2760 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph J. Martinkoski, Sr.
no arguable merit to the claim that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement. 5. Was Martinkoski denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8147 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-Mendez appeals his judgment of conviction and denial of his postconviction motion based on his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70115 - 2014-09-15

State v. John S. Provo
separated from “the public.” We also reject Provo’s remaining claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the incident claimed that a vehicle had struck a utility pole and a male had left the scene. Popovich arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131518 - 2014-12-10

State v. Agustin Velez
, but claimed not to remember very much about the incident and insisted that he had never seen the victim before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11315 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. Kuykendoll No. 2007AP1995-CR 2 claims that the circuit court: (1) erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32620 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sherri Korntved v. Advanced Healthcare
judgment on those claims was improperly granted. Because there was no genuine issue of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19040 - 2017-09-21

Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
District Court, Central District of California, presenting numerous statutory and common law claims,[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9165 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence modification. Kuykendoll claims that the circuit court: (1) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32620 - 2008-05-05