Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24531 - 24540 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-day jury trial. As the trial date approached, the Meisners reached a stipulation with Trumbull
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365760 - 2021-05-11

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Colleen A.
Department made reasonable efforts to provide the services ordered by the trial court; and (3) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4836 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Kreutz
of admissibility of the blood alcohol content (BAC) test results during his trial. We are unpersuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8595 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 171
found he sustained as a result of an automobile accident with Close. They also appeal the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57000 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Brian B. Burke
of the trial court’s order denying his motion for a stay of criminal proceedings until fifteen days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5549 - 2017-09-19

WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP977-CR Complete Title ...
NEUBAUER, P.J. Anthony C. Boyden appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77319 - 2012-03-27

[PDF] NOTICE
is not produced at trial. ¶3 When Marquez was questioned by the police, the police recorded his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60902 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, or a Machner 1 hearing because Terrell’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208125 - 2018-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s statement is recorded by police but the recording is not produced at trial. ¶3 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60902 - 2011-03-15

Lyle Zabel v. Kenneth Doepker
by an amended covenant recorded by surrounding property owners. We affirm the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14107 - 2005-03-31