Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24541 - 24550 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24541 - 24550 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Sheffield Systems, Inc.
. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See Smith v. Katz, 218 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 578 N.W.2d 202, 204
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See Smith v. Katz, 218 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 578 N.W.2d 202, 204
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 42
declarations pass constitutional muster is a matter of law that we assess de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
declarations pass constitutional muster is a matter of law that we assess de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board
the circuit court’s decision de novo, as it involves a question of law: the application of statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16051 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s decision de novo, as it involves a question of law: the application of statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16051 - 2005-03-31
Betty Butler v. AAA Life Insurance Company
. ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 66
and conclusions of law are “great weight deference,” “due deference” and de novo review, or no deference. DILHR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32108 - 2008-05-27
and conclusions of law are “great weight deference,” “due deference” and de novo review, or no deference. DILHR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32108 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional law that we review de novo. State v. Manuel, 2005 WI 75, ¶25, 281 Wis. 2d 554, 697 N.W.2d 811
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305169 - 2020-11-18
of constitutional law that we review de novo. State v. Manuel, 2005 WI 75, ¶25, 281 Wis. 2d 554, 697 N.W.2d 811
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305169 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
knowledge. See De Keuster v. Green Bay & W. R.R. Co., 264 Wis. 476, 479, 59 N.W.2d 452 (1953). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
knowledge. See De Keuster v. Green Bay & W. R.R. Co., 264 Wis. 476, 479, 59 N.W.2d 452 (1953). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott Heimermann
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19