Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24541 - 24550 of 29817 for des.

[PDF] State v. Timothy Ziebart
to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. ¶27 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491787 - 2022-03-08

[PDF] WI APP 147
constitutional requirements is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶15 Larsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28847 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] R. Scott McCormick v. Richard A. Schubring
in the shoes of a grantor may obtain an easement of necessity are questions of law that we decide de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16617 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For veterans
-4849. Outagamie County Outagamie County Circuit Court Judges John A. Des Jardins and Gregory B. Gill Jr
/services/veteran/index.htm - 2026-02-18

[PDF] State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19

General Accident Insurance Company of America v. Schoendorf & Sorgi
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7997 - 2008-06-23

Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105627 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard G. White
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We give special scrutiny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harry L. Seymer
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24