Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24541 - 24550 of 58277 for speedy trial.

State v. Julian D. Pope
from a judgment convicting him of possessing cocaine with intent to deliver it. At Pope’s jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14925 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nathaniel Harris
, the trial court withheld sentence and gave him a three-year term of probation. Harris’s appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Cassville v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
. They contend that the trial court should have affirmed WERC's order on a prohibited labor practices complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8107 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Torey U. Jennings
on appeal. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment. The State charged Jennings on one felony count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Elaine M. Parodo v. Jerry J. Parodo
argues that the trial court decision did not expressly state why a percentage figure, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4736 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joseph Loizzo v. Wolfhead Sportsman's Club
for liability arising from the September 3, 1995 race. The trial court ruled that Sphere Drake had no duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12799 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey J. Ward
for not challenging the sentence. Because the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion and Ward can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3138 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas F.W.
., recommitment order, claiming, alternatively, that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15039 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Harris
, contrary to § 961.41(1m)(h), STATS. After Harris pleaded no contest to the charge, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13182 - 2017-09-21

State v. David W. Pender
an officer and disorderly conduct. He maintains that the trial court erred by refusing to give a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31