Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24571 - 24580 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 24571 - 24580 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial that resulted in the judgment, Jackson’s case was subject to a municipal court proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649424 - 2023-04-27
trial that resulted in the judgment, Jackson’s case was subject to a municipal court proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649424 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
At the same proceeding, sentence was withheld in #91-CR-601, the case in which charges were brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10461 - 2017-09-20
At the same proceeding, sentence was withheld in #91-CR-601, the case in which charges were brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10461 - 2017-09-20
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
State v. Tina M. Satzke
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tina M. Satzke
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 38
2009 WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1681 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35503 - 2009-03-24
2009 WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1681 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35503 - 2009-03-24