Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24581 - 24590 of 38079 for ph d.
Search results 24581 - 24590 of 38079 for ph d.
COURT OF APPEALS
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Polk County: Eugene D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143666 - 2015-06-29
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Polk County: Eugene D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143666 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) or the victim under par. (d) and the court determines that sentence adjustment is in the public interest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=495940 - 2022-03-23
) or the victim under par. (d) and the court determines that sentence adjustment is in the public interest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=495940 - 2022-03-23
State v. Ricky McMorris
grounds. “[D]ouble jeopardy bars a retrial when the defendant has successfully moved for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
grounds. “[D]ouble jeopardy bars a retrial when the defendant has successfully moved for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
]ourt do so.” The court then asked Hinton directly, “[D]o you agree that the [c]ourt can proceed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767558 - 2024-02-22
]ourt do so.” The court then asked Hinton directly, “[D]o you agree that the [c]ourt can proceed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767558 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Ruben F. Herrera
. In reviewing a challenge to a sentence, it is “presume[d] that the trial court acted reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7987 - 2017-09-19
. In reviewing a challenge to a sentence, it is “presume[d] that the trial court acted reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7987 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169101 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Xavier N. Love
is redetermined if necessary, counsel is appointed and transcripts are ordered. RULE 809.30(2)(d) and (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20639 - 2017-09-21
is redetermined if necessary, counsel is appointed and transcripts are ordered. RULE 809.30(2)(d) and (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20639 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
complain about the trial court’s decision. D. Discrimination Claim. ¶12 Gerard claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26615 - 2014-09-15
complain about the trial court’s decision. D. Discrimination Claim. ¶12 Gerard claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Reynauld Quiles v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.
County: JACQUELINE D. SCHELLINGER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14638 - 2017-09-21
County: JACQUELINE D. SCHELLINGER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21