Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24581 - 24590 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24581 - 24590 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) (1987-88) and 939.62 (1987-88). The trial court imposed a sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31481 - 2008-01-14
, in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) (1987-88) and 939.62 (1987-88). The trial court imposed a sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31481 - 2008-01-14
State v. James A. Engel
the influence. Engel entered a no-contest plea to the charge after the trial court denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26590 - 2006-09-27
the influence. Engel entered a no-contest plea to the charge after the trial court denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26590 - 2006-09-27
Elaine M. Parodo v. Jerry J. Parodo
argues that the trial court decision did not expressly state why a percentage figure, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4736 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court decision did not expressly state why a percentage figure, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4736 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
assistance of trial counsel due to counsel’s failure to object when the court gave each party too few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
assistance of trial counsel due to counsel’s failure to object when the court gave each party too few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
David E. Meiers v. Frederick W. Bennett
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
George Huxhold v. John Joseph Campbell
allegedly due under a real estate listing contract. After a bench trial, the court awarded Huxhold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6618 - 2017-09-19
allegedly due under a real estate listing contract. After a bench trial, the court awarded Huxhold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6618 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Torey U. Jennings
on appeal. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment. The State charged Jennings on one felony count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
on appeal. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment. The State charged Jennings on one felony count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy S. Headrick
. Timothy Headrick appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3210 - 2005-03-31
. Timothy Headrick appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Crider
the sentence. He argues that his trial attorney was ineffective because he was No. 01-1298-CR 01-0279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3961 - 2017-09-20
the sentence. He argues that his trial attorney was ineffective because he was No. 01-1298-CR 01-0279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3961 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After a bench trial, the court dismissed the action. As the reason for the dismissal, the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20
. After a bench trial, the court dismissed the action. As the reason for the dismissal, the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20