Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 59008 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 59008 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Darin W. Baratka
, Baratka claims that his motion for summary judgment should have been granted. ¶9 This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
, Baratka claims that his motion for summary judgment should have been granted. ¶9 This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Sherman, JJ. ¶1 SHERMAN, J. This appeal involves a claim for relocation payments by Hack-A-Way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21
and Sherman, JJ. ¶1 SHERMAN, J. This appeal involves a claim for relocation payments by Hack-A-Way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
. After the Rupenas settled their claims with Jefferson Yachts, No. 01-3085 3 the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
. After the Rupenas settled their claims with Jefferson Yachts, No. 01-3085 3 the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David G. Paeske v. Joanell W. Paeske
valued the intact collection at $20,000. The other major issue was Joanell’s claim for maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11282 - 2017-09-19
valued the intact collection at $20,000. The other major issue was Joanell’s claim for maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11282 - 2017-09-19
Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
of the circuit court which dismissed their claims under § 100.18, Stats., and limited the amount of certain costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court which dismissed their claims under § 100.18, Stats., and limited the amount of certain costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
erroneously denied his collateral attack on his second offense. Specifically, he claims that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
erroneously denied his collateral attack on his second offense. Specifically, he claims that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Godschalx
also alleges a No. 01-1072-CR 2 due process claim relating to an increase in his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3869 - 2017-09-20
also alleges a No. 01-1072-CR 2 due process claim relating to an increase in his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3869 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied his claims and we affirmed. State v. Mull, No. 2001AP3166-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court denied his claims and we affirmed. State v. Mull, No. 2001AP3166-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Richardson’s condition in her respondent’s brief, stating that Richardson’s claim is based only on the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117659 - 2017-09-21
Richardson’s condition in her respondent’s brief, stating that Richardson’s claim is based only on the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117659 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
are employees of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21
are employees of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21