Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
decisions and was clearly not deficient. ¶27 On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
decisions and was clearly not deficient. ¶27 On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197303 - 2017-11-15
, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197303 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33820 - 2014-09-15
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For veterans
-4849. Outagamie County Outagamie County Circuit Court Judges John A. Des Jardins and Gregory B. Gill Jr
/services/veteran/index.htm - 2026-02-24
-4849. Outagamie County Outagamie County Circuit Court Judges John A. Des Jardins and Gregory B. Gill Jr
/services/veteran/index.htm - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336154 - 2021-02-17
to order restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336154 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
Robert G. Morris v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
an order for summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court. Waters v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4901 - 2017-09-19
an order for summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court. Waters v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal issue that we decide de novo, accepting the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616505 - 2023-01-31
is a legal issue that we decide de novo, accepting the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616505 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
Todd A. Erdmann v. SF Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc.
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14503 - 2017-09-21
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Wilcox, 355 Wis. 2d 1, ¶15. In other words, accepting as true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209509 - 2018-03-08
of law that we review de novo. Wilcox, 355 Wis. 2d 1, ¶15. In other words, accepting as true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209509 - 2018-03-08