Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 82412 for simple case.
Search results 24591 - 24600 of 82412 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report discussing the plea-taking procedures in this case. Counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
a supplemental no-merit report discussing the plea-taking procedures in this case. Counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
cases, Kevin L. Jones appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying a motion to modify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143123 - 2017-09-21
cases, Kevin L. Jones appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying a motion to modify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael J. Kane, Jr. v. Grace Kroll
Case No.: 95-0295 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8580 - 2017-09-19
Case No.: 95-0295 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8580 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Susan E. Burks
; it was a "subjective confusion" case. The court therefore did not have an opportunity to evaluate its observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3454 - 2017-09-19
; it was a "subjective confusion" case. The court therefore did not have an opportunity to evaluate its observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shirley Daniels v. Kohl's Food Stores, Inc.
by November 10, 1995 or instant case will be dismissed.” Daniels’s counsel never noticed the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10393 - 2017-09-20
by November 10, 1995 or instant case will be dismissed.” Daniels’s counsel never noticed the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19