Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu baja double Bluto Kabupaten Sumenep Jawa Timur.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu baja double Bluto Kabupaten Sumenep Jawa Timur.
[PDF]
State v. Lewis Altman, Jr.
referred to a different victim. Therefore, there was no double jeopardy violation. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15222 - 2017-09-21
referred to a different victim. Therefore, there was no double jeopardy violation. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15222 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. This implicates the rule against “double counting.” See Seidlitz v. Seidlitz, 217 Wis. 2d 82, 90-91, 578 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108900 - 2014-03-10
. This implicates the rule against “double counting.” See Seidlitz v. Seidlitz, 217 Wis. 2d 82, 90-91, 578 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108900 - 2014-03-10
CA Blank Order
id., 76 Wis. 2d at 178. Further, double jeopardy and the attendant due process concerns
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
id., 76 Wis. 2d at 178. Further, double jeopardy and the attendant due process concerns
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1210 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV818
it might serve, in effect, to double the damages H&R Block receives—an extension of the non-compete
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29226 - 2014-09-15
it might serve, in effect, to double the damages H&R Block receives—an extension of the non-compete
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29226 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David A. Roeming v. Peterson Builders, Inc.
, 456 N.W.2d 619, 624 (Ct. App. 1990). The respondents have requested the imposition of double costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13470 - 2017-09-21
, 456 N.W.2d 619, 624 (Ct. App. 1990). The respondents have requested the imposition of double costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13470 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s double jeopardy right if the charges are the same in law and fact, creating a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121800 - 2014-09-15
a defendant’s double jeopardy right if the charges are the same in law and fact, creating a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
words, Brown argues that the penalty enhancer cannot do more than double the initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
words, Brown argues that the penalty enhancer cannot do more than double the initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Bryan K. Heckman
Initially, Heckman challenged his conviction on double jeopardy grounds, but he has withdrawn that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11134 - 2017-09-19
Initially, Heckman challenged his conviction on double jeopardy grounds, but he has withdrawn that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Allen F. Ringelstetter
. The third test was to count backwards from 100 to 80. Ringelstetter did not miss any numbers or “double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6000 - 2017-09-19
. The third test was to count backwards from 100 to 80. Ringelstetter did not miss any numbers or “double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6000 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in excluding the double-layered statement that Bennie told Kinte who told Logan that Bennie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103997 - 2013-11-12
court erred in excluding the double-layered statement that Bennie told Kinte who told Logan that Bennie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103997 - 2013-11-12