Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 6253 for cf.

COURT OF APPEALS
matters shown to be of consequence to their plea bargains. Cf., e.g., State v. Riekkoff, 112 Wis. 2d 119
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and that Newson was therefore prejudiced by trial counsel’s failure to pursue a suppression motion. Cf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486932 - 2022-02-18

Ashley E. Mews v. Derek J. Beaster
into their risk-benefit analyses, there was nothing unreasonable about the offer or the timing of it. Cf. Mackie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7481 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the program. Cf. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶40. ¶15 Moreover, Dean cannot show that the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
refusal to act on its own motion to reduce the sentence credit award. Cf. Ford Motor Credit Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27

State v. Ramiro Villareal
and was necessary to fully understand the context of the case. Cf. id. at 236-37, 341 N.W.2d at 720
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8849 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
order would therefore be frivolous within the meaning of Anders. Cf. State v. Scherreiks, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08

[PDF] State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1099 Cir. Ct. No. 97-CF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court properly granted summary judgment in the Bank’s favor.5 Cf. id. 3. Unclean Hands ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ricardo A. Montemayor, Jr.
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-3006-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-633 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5878 - 2017-09-19