Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
consistent with constitutional requirements is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55300 - 2014-09-15
consistent with constitutional requirements is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35671 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Winnebago v. David M. Meza
meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2538 - 2017-09-19
meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Ralph C. Leese
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
, the order is affirmed. DISCUSSION Scope of Review. This court will determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
, the order is affirmed. DISCUSSION Scope of Review. This court will determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jacquelyn J. Dingeldein
, and therefore our review of the circuit court’s bindover decision is de novo. State v. Anderson, 2005 WI 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
, and therefore our review of the circuit court’s bindover decision is de novo. State v. Anderson, 2005 WI 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108494 - 2017-09-21
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108494 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶7 Under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(1), crimes may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶7 Under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(1), crimes may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05