Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 6659 for mix.

State v. Joanne Sekula
and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of fact and law, the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3712 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See id. ¶8 Whether counsel was ineffective is a mixed question of fact and law. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169015 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
of counsel, we are presented with a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6345 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
and prejudice involve mixed questions of law and fact. State v. Taylor, 2004 WI App 81, ¶14, 272 Wis. 2d 642
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30629 - 2014-09-15

State v. Anou Lo
as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We will not reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Frankwick
decisions why the court found that this was not a good faith transfer. Our standard of review is mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14432 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
this section involves a mixed question of fact and law. Id. What a reasonable party would have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12999 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
presents mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requirements—“presents a mixed question of law and fact.” Id., ¶15. A trial court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922351 - 2025-03-05

Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
). An inquiry under this section involves a mixed question of fact and law. Id. What a reasonable party would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12999 - 2005-03-31