Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 56190 for n y c.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 56190 for n y c.
State v. Shawn D. Pierce
C felony); 939.50(3)(c) (maximum term of imprisonment for Class C felony ten years) (1993–94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18698 - 2005-06-27
C felony); 939.50(3)(c) (maximum term of imprisonment for Class C felony ten years) (1993–94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18698 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
placed on him when it attempted to provide him services. See State v. Raymond C., 187 Wis. 2d 10, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398278 - 2021-07-23
placed on him when it attempted to provide him services. See State v. Raymond C., 187 Wis. 2d 10, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398278 - 2021-07-23
[PDF]
WI App 97
the petition granted. See Caldwell v. Percy, 105 Wis. 2d 354, 357 n.3, 314 N.W.2d 135 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50730 - 2014-09-15
the petition granted. See Caldwell v. Percy, 105 Wis. 2d 354, 357 n.3, 314 N.W.2d 135 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50730 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI App 97
of welfare benefits.” Driver, 289 Wis. 2d 727, ¶13. Driver recognized that after Goldberg: [i]n order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50730 - 2010-07-27
of welfare benefits.” Driver, 289 Wis. 2d 727, ¶13. Driver recognized that after Goldberg: [i]n order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50730 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is limited: [A]n appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
is limited: [A]n appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is limited: [A]n appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138606 - 2015-03-30
is limited: [A]n appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138606 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not to testify. ¶5 As pertinent to this appeal, WIS. STAT. § 346.61 provides that “[i]n addition to being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
not to testify. ¶5 As pertinent to this appeal, WIS. STAT. § 346.61 provides that “[i]n addition to being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
State v. William Nielsen
, 465 n.2, 596 N.W.2d 496 (Ct. App. 1999) (We need not consider arguments not developed.). However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3325 - 2005-03-31
, 465 n.2, 596 N.W.2d 496 (Ct. App. 1999) (We need not consider arguments not developed.). However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3325 - 2005-03-31
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
simply stated that "[y]our affiant wrote the pretrial date wrong and did not appear." The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15916 - 2005-03-31
simply stated that "[y]our affiant wrote the pretrial date wrong and did not appear." The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
simply stated that "[y]our affiant wrote the pretrial date wrong and did not appear." The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
simply stated that "[y]our affiant wrote the pretrial date wrong and did not appear." The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21