Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 63187 for records.

Richard T. DeBroux v. The Board of Canvassers for the City of Appleton
of electronic voting systems ¼: punch card, marksense and direct record. The SEB identifies the City voting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10794 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard T. DeBroux v. The Board of Canvassers for the City of Appleton
approved three different types of electronic voting systems …: punch card, marksense and direct record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10785 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
of her rights to her oldest daughter. Because the record supports the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, responses, and supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175213 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. Based upon our review of the record, the no-merit report, and the response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223913 - 2018-10-22

[PDF] Richard T. DeBroux v. The Board of Canvassers for the City of Appleton
approved three different types of electronic voting systems …: punch card, marksense and direct record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10808 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recorded custodial interviews with Hill. At the outset of the first interview, police advised Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175685 - 2017-09-21

Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
that the evidence was insufficient to warrant termination of her rights to her oldest daughter. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3590 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rachel W. Kelty
the right to assert a multiplicity claim when the claim cannot be resolved on the record. When a defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25869 - 2006-07-11

COURT OF APPEALS
argument in turn. But first, we briefly discuss the state of the appellate Record and our approach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61892 - 2011-03-28