Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 46941 for shows.
Search results 2461 - 2470 of 46941 for shows.
State v. Matthew J. Buman
. Buman also argues that his extrinsic evidence shows the victim’s bias or motive to fabricate. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12796 - 2005-03-31
. Buman also argues that his extrinsic evidence shows the victim’s bias or motive to fabricate. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Thomas V.C.
that the trial court erred by not permitting him to withdraw his admission. Because Thomas did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2557 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by not permitting him to withdraw his admission. Because Thomas did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2557 - 2017-09-19
State v. William Hardy Thornton, Jr.
, “a defendant must show that counsel's performance was both deficient and prejudicial.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10283 - 2005-03-31
, “a defendant must show that counsel's performance was both deficient and prejudicial.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10283 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Ray Juber
ruled that Juber had satisfied the burden of showing that his plea had not been knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
ruled that Juber had satisfied the burden of showing that his plea had not been knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
showing the board’s reasoning is not required “as long as [the] reasoning is clear from the transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617296 - 2023-02-01
showing the board’s reasoning is not required “as long as [the] reasoning is clear from the transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617296 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Hardy Thornton, Jr.
(1984). Thus, “a defendant must show that counsel's performance was both deficient and prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10283 - 2017-09-20
(1984). Thus, “a defendant must show that counsel's performance was both deficient and prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10283 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fails to make a required showing, namely, prejudice resulting from the No. 2018AP2262-CR 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251761 - 2019-12-20
fails to make a required showing, namely, prejudice resulting from the No. 2018AP2262-CR 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251761 - 2019-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the sexual contact. ¶5 To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Brown must show both deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32051 - 2008-03-10
the sexual contact. ¶5 To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Brown must show both deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32051 - 2008-03-10