Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24601 - 24610 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 24601 - 24610 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Giebel
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8050 - 2017-09-19
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8050 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cleophus Amerson
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. A jury convicted Amerson of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13460 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. A jury convicted Amerson of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Figueroa
appeals pro se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18032 - 2017-09-21
appeals pro se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Bloss failed to state sufficient facts to overcome SLHD’s motion to dismiss for failure to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676523 - 2023-07-06
that Bloss failed to state sufficient facts to overcome SLHD’s motion to dismiss for failure to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676523 - 2023-07-06
State v. Pedro Figueroa
CURIAM. Pedro Figueroa appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
CURIAM. Pedro Figueroa appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
State v. Kevin Giebel
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that none of Giebel's contentions have any merit, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8050 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that none of Giebel's contentions have any merit, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8050 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a suppression motion in June and July, 2009. On July 17, 2009, the State moved to dismiss the case without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186778 - 2017-09-21
a suppression motion in June and July, 2009. On July 17, 2009, the State moved to dismiss the case without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred when it denied his pretrial motion to suppress evidence.2 For the reasons that follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033234 - 2025-11-05
court erred when it denied his pretrial motion to suppress evidence.2 For the reasons that follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033234 - 2025-11-05
2010 WI APP 30
when it denied his motion to strike three of his four prior OWI offenses, all from Michigan, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46000 - 2010-02-23
when it denied his motion to strike three of his four prior OWI offenses, all from Michigan, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46000 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to dismiss, arguing both that Rader’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609270 - 2023-01-10
motion to dismiss, arguing both that Rader’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609270 - 2023-01-10