Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24601 - 24610 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 24601 - 24610 of 83454 for case code.
CA Blank Order
conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. In Brown County case No. 2013CF1036, the complaint charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01
conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. In Brown County case No. 2013CF1036, the complaint charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01
State v. Dannie Thomas
there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. This case arises from two separate criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12758 - 2005-03-31
there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. This case arises from two separate criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vernon County v. Richard J. Peterson
to confuse the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10500 - 2017-09-20
to confuse the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10500 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
. ¶2 The appellants commenced this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26243 - 2017-09-21
. ¶2 The appellants commenced this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lisa M. Berger
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and with operating after revocation. The case was dismissed, and the State refiled the charges in February 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34916 - 2014-09-15
, and with operating after revocation. The case was dismissed, and the State refiled the charges in February 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34916 - 2014-09-15
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-09-22
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-09-22