Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24611 - 24620 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 24611 - 24620 of 83454 for case code.
State v. Louis E. Guerra
conviction cannot be used to enhance his punishment in this case. This court is not persuaded. ΒΆ3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2878 - 2005-03-31
conviction cannot be used to enhance his punishment in this case. This court is not persuaded. ΒΆ3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209383 - 2018-03-07
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209383 - 2018-03-07
Thomas H. Barland v. Eau Claire County
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1607 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17120 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1607 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Third Branch, fall 1998
and Families requesting $511,200 to implement innov- ative case processing strategies in child abuse
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall98.pdf - 2009-12-02
and Families requesting $511,200 to implement innov- ative case processing strategies in child abuse
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall98.pdf - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2016 WI 26 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1424-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165775 - 2017-09-21
2016 WI 26 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1424-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 55
2025 WI App 55 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2023AP1478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990122 - 2025-10-09
2025 WI App 55 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2023AP1478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990122 - 2025-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the seminal case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), he contends that the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33044 - 2014-09-15
on the seminal case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), he contends that the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33044 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for rehearing the court issued a second opinion in the same case, see Pick Industries v. Gebhard-Berghammer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523171 - 2022-05-19
for rehearing the court issued a second opinion in the same case, see Pick Industries v. Gebhard-Berghammer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523171 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
We use a pseudonym to refer to the victim in this case for ease of reference and to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456081 - 2021-11-23
We use a pseudonym to refer to the victim in this case for ease of reference and to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456081 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
Kramer Business Service, Inc. v. Hyperion, Inc.
the small claims jurisdictional limit of $5,000, and the case was assigned to a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
the small claims jurisdictional limit of $5,000, and the case was assigned to a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19