Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24611 - 24620 of 75055 for judgment for us.

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment entered in favor of Portfolio Recovery 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590174 - 2022-11-16

COURT OF APPEALS
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30

Lynn Wonka v. Samuel Cari
of Review ¶9 We review summary judgment dispositions de novo and apply the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: THOMAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5480 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. John H. Newkirk
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: JOHN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2142 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: MARY KAY WAGNER-MALLOY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2114 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Benjamin, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. DERAMUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42030 - 2014-09-15

City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
. Wagner, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31