Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 57894 for id.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 57894 for id.
[PDF]
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4257 - 2017-09-19
is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Eli J. O., Sr.
extension until March 1 pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.365(6). Id. at 642. The court scheduled a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19562 - 2017-09-21
extension until March 1 pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.365(6). Id. at 642. The court scheduled a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of discretion. Id. A new factor is established by a “set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220417 - 2018-10-02
exercise of discretion. Id. A new factor is established by a “set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220417 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
novo. See id., ¶90. Whether it warrants sentence modification is left to the circuit court’s sound
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15
novo. See id., ¶90. Whether it warrants sentence modification is left to the circuit court’s sound
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. A defendant must show by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72963 - 2014-09-15
clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. A defendant must show by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72963 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
will not reverse the trial court’s decision unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. See id. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
will not reverse the trial court’s decision unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. See id. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia Flowers v. Howard A. Newton
against the moving party. Id. at 338-39, 294 N.W.2d at 477. On summary judgment, the court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11805 - 2017-09-21
against the moving party. Id. at 338-39, 294 N.W.2d at 477. On summary judgment, the court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11805 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
of fact unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, whether a given set of facts amount to ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
of fact unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, whether a given set of facts amount to ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
of calculating the maximum initial confinement term he faced. Id., 276 Wis. 2d 434, ¶¶6-10. McKinnie’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
of calculating the maximum initial confinement term he faced. Id., 276 Wis. 2d 434, ¶¶6-10. McKinnie’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
County of Price v. Jeremy L. Kraus
for the arraignment without prejudice to the right to demand a jury trial. Id. at 652-53. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3321 - 2005-03-31
for the arraignment without prejudice to the right to demand a jury trial. Id. at 652-53. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3321 - 2005-03-31