Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 46982 for show's.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 46982 for show's.
State v. David D. Brown
. To establish prejudice, he must show a reasonable probability that, but for his counsel’s unprofessional errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
. To establish prejudice, he must show a reasonable probability that, but for his counsel’s unprofessional errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Cammarata v. Pheasant Run Partnership
to anticipated damages. See id. The deposition testimony showed that the damages figure was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5416 - 2005-03-31
to anticipated damages. See id. The deposition testimony showed that the damages figure was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry A. Tollefson
. First, Tollefson has not made a sufficient showing that the information was indeed false. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2015-04-29
. First, Tollefson has not made a sufficient showing that the information was indeed false. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2015-04-29
State v. Lawrence Leon Ratliff, Jr.
show that a person was in police custody is a question of law that we decide independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18578 - 2005-06-15
show that a person was in police custody is a question of law that we decide independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18578 - 2005-06-15
State v. Lance L. Egner
by showing a clear legislative intent that cumulative punishments are not authorized. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7153 - 2015-02-01
by showing a clear legislative intent that cumulative punishments are not authorized. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7153 - 2015-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
any legal authority showing that prisoners have such standing. ¶4 Stanton’s third argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
any legal authority showing that prisoners have such standing. ¶4 Stanton’s third argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
State v. Armando Salinas
he made to the police should not have been admitted at trial because the State failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2013-08-21
he made to the police should not have been admitted at trial because the State failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2013-08-21
State v. Michael J. Parent
first establish a need to review the document. If the inmate makes this showing, the PSI author should
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2008-10-01
first establish a need to review the document. If the inmate makes this showing, the PSI author should
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2008-10-01
CA Blank Order
of discretion on the ground that it was unduly harsh must show that the sentence was “so excessive and unusual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110340 - 2014-04-15
of discretion on the ground that it was unduly harsh must show that the sentence was “so excessive and unusual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110340 - 2014-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, show that Fink’s violations involved “methamphetamine.” This minor variance does not give rise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353309 - 2021-04-07
, show that Fink’s violations involved “methamphetamine.” This minor variance does not give rise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353309 - 2021-04-07