Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 24621 - 24630 of 58509 for speedy trial.
State v. Patricia A. McTavish
a controlled substance (THC), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e). She also appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15857 - 2005-03-31
a controlled substance (THC), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e). She also appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15857 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nancy R. Lamon
on an additional lesser-included offense, and whether the trial court erred by concluding that Lamon failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
on an additional lesser-included offense, and whether the trial court erred by concluding that Lamon failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry C. Kazee
.” He contends that the trial court improperly construed his attempt to have a sentence following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3389 - 2005-03-31
.” He contends that the trial court improperly construed his attempt to have a sentence following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3389 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Headrick
convicting him of armed robbery. He argues that the trial court should have suppressed his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3210 - 2017-09-19
convicting him of armed robbery. He argues that the trial court should have suppressed his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3210 - 2017-09-19
David E. Meiers v. Frederick W. Bennett
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After a bench trial, the court dismissed the action. As the reason for the dismissal, the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20
. After a bench trial, the court dismissed the action. As the reason for the dismissal, the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
date of that order. The date on the notice of appeal is the date the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
date of that order. The date on the notice of appeal is the date the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
for the same offense. Because the trial court lacked the jurisdiction to try Deering’s third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27295 - 2006-12-04
for the same offense. Because the trial court lacked the jurisdiction to try Deering’s third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27295 - 2006-12-04
First Bank (N.A.) v. Russell Cleary
Ellsworth, WI 54011 Pamela Radtke, Trial Court Clerk La Crosse County Courthouse 400 North Fourth Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10185 - 2005-03-31
Ellsworth, WI 54011 Pamela Radtke, Trial Court Clerk La Crosse County Courthouse 400 North Fourth Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Joel E. Bohringer v. Daniel J. Bohringer
-0507 -2- dispositive issue is whether the trial court's findings of fact in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8677 - 2017-09-19
-0507 -2- dispositive issue is whether the trial court's findings of fact in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8677 - 2017-09-19