Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24641 - 24650 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24641 - 24650 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
[PDF]
Jane Hausman v. St. Croix Care Center
is a question of law which we determine de novo. See Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis. 2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 305
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17101 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we determine de novo. See Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis. 2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 305
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment submissions ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365801 - 2021-05-11
summary judgment submissions ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365801 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph J. Jares, M.D. v. Peter F. Ullrich, M.D.
omitted). The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5903 - 2017-09-19
omitted). The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5903 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 110
standard is a question of law to which we give de novo review.” Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32876 - 2014-09-15
standard is a question of law to which we give de novo review.” Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32876 - 2014-09-15
State v. Clarence Givens
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12420 - 2005-03-31
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12420 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Kathy S.
of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49‑50. ¶21 Kathy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15971 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49‑50. ¶21 Kathy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15971 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
disagree. Standard of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76950 - 2012-01-23
disagree. Standard of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76950 - 2012-01-23