Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24651 - 24660 of 57165 for id.

State v. Richard A. Brown
without the in-person testimony of the psychologist.” Id. at 199. Concluding that the psychologist’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6527 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 46
, ¶24. Thus, “[e]ach extension hearing requires proof of current dangerousness.” Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264273 - 2020-08-11

[PDF] Jim Walter Color Separations v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
judgment for that of LIRC as to the weight of the evidence. See id. at 384, 571 N.W.2d at 171; § 227.57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14389 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
or the trial court misapplied the law. Id. This court will affirm the trial court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41849 - 2009-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reliance on inaccurate information at sentencing. Id., ¶38. The defendant must first demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467454 - 2021-12-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶¶22-23. 2 A.D. does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501479 - 2022-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See id., ¶23; see also WIS. STAT. § 971.08; State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263486 - 2020-06-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. Id.; WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). “[S]ummary judgment may be employed in the grounds phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238549 - 2019-04-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts. Id. ¶8 If a suspect’s expressed interest in remaining silent “is susceptible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190513 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and it is not merely cumulative. See id., ¶13. His claim founders on whether there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182809 - 2017-09-21