Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24671 - 24680 of 59325 for quit claim deed.
Search results 24671 - 24680 of 59325 for quit claim deed.
James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
a circuit court order which affirmed a prison programming decision on certiorari review. He claims prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
a circuit court order which affirmed a prison programming decision on certiorari review. He claims prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report considers whether a claim could be made that Jones’s no-contest plea was not freely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
. The no-merit report considers whether a claim could be made that Jones’s no-contest plea was not freely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesus Serrano
for post-conviction relief. The judgment was entered on Serrano's guilty pleas. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
for post-conviction relief. The judgment was entered on Serrano's guilty pleas. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karl P. Breitweiser
contends that Breitweiser’s claim is unfounded because the time period for the repeated acts charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4567 - 2005-03-31
contends that Breitweiser’s claim is unfounded because the time period for the repeated acts charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven P. Muckerheide
concentration. At trial, Muckerheide claimed that the victim, who was Muckerheide’s passenger, grabbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24520 - 2017-09-21
concentration. At trial, Muckerheide claimed that the victim, who was Muckerheide’s passenger, grabbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24520 - 2017-09-21
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110086 - 2014-04-06
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110086 - 2014-04-06
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214181 - 2018-06-11
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214181 - 2018-06-11
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210980 - 2018-04-09
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210980 - 2018-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
claims: (1) he was prejudiced when the State mentioned an incorrect date during its rebuttal closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
claims: (1) he was prejudiced when the State mentioned an incorrect date during its rebuttal closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
credible. His requested witnesses do not support his claims. Even if there had been verbal threats, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3952 - 2017-09-20
credible. His requested witnesses do not support his claims. Even if there had been verbal threats, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3952 - 2017-09-20